Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 25;22:119. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02644-y

Table 5.

Corticomotor activity after different tDCS interventions (n = 48)

Group Anodal group (n = 12) Bilateral group (n = 12) Cathodal group (n = 12) Sham group (n = 12)
pre post pre post pre post pre post p value
RMT (%) 58.0 (49.8, 63.8) 58.0 (50.5, 64.5) 63.0 (48.3, 69.5) 63.0 (48.5, 68.8) 62.5 (54.0, 65.8) 65.0 (53.5, 67.8) 57.0 (52.5, 65.5) 57.5 (52.5, 64.0)
change 0.0 (0.0, 2.0) 1.5 (0.0, 2.8) 2.0 (0.0, 3.0) 0.0 (0.0, 1.0) 0.153
SP (ms)

130.1

(110.2, 139.5)

124.1

(117.4, 136.8)

142.8

(117.2, 168.9)

154.5

(128.3, 189.8)

127.9

(118.8, 144.1)

139.4

(127.3, 156.4)#

144.7

(131.4, 156.5)

145.5

(130.4, 156.3)

change -1.1 (-3.0, 6.4) 9.2 (3.0, 20.5)a,s 7.0 (3.4, 14.6)s 1.5 (-3.7, 3.6) 0.002
SICI (%) 49.1 (40.9, 58.6) 45.3 (34.3, 60.4) 46.0 (39.2, 65.7) 47.3 (37.7, 58.1) 42.2 (39.6, 48.9) 42.6 (34.4, 48.2) 42.4 (37.2, 63.4) 47.9 (38.2, 59.2)
change -2.5 (-6.2, -0.1) -1.6 (-11.9, 12.0) 1.2 (-9.0, 4.9) 2.8 (-1.7, 7.8) 0.296

Data are presented as the median (interquartile range)

Abbreviations: RMT, resting motor threshold; SP, silent period; SICI, short interval intracortical inhibition

#, p < 0.05 for intragroup comparison. a, p < .05 as compared with Anodal group. s, p < .05 as compared with Sham group