Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 24;22:134. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02216-x

Table 2.

Logistic regression analyses for the association between RC/HDL-C ratio and NAFLD in different models

RC/HDL-C ratio quartile (OR :95% CI)
Multivariable analysis
(per SD increase)
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 P-trend
Unadjusted Model 2.90 (2.76, 3.05) Ref 3.40 (2.58, 4.47) 11.48(8.91,14.78) 39.10 (30.53, 50.07) < 0.0001
Model I 2.46 (2.34, 2.60) Ref 2.93 (2.22, 3.86) 8.59 (6.63, 11.12) 25.88 (20.03, 33.44) < 0.0001
Model II 1.58 (1.49, 1.67) Ref 1.89 (1.41, 2.53) 3.58 (2.72, 4.73) 6.20 (4.71, 8.18) < 0.0001
Model III 1.51 (1.43, 1.61) Ref 1.82 (1.35, 2.45) 3.25 (2.45, 4.32) 5.42 (4.06, 7.22) < 0.0001
Model IV 1.53 (1.44, 1.63) Ref 1.80 (1.33, 2.42) 3.25 (2.45, 4.32) 5.49 (4.11, 7.33) < 0.0001

RC/HDL-C ratio remnant cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio, OR odds ratios, CI confidence interval, SD standard deviation, NAFLD non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Model I adjusted for sex and age

Model II adjusted for sex, BMI, TC, FPG and SBP

Model III adjusted for sex, age, BMI, ALT, AST, height, habit of exercise, GGT, TC, FPG, HbA1c and SBP

Model IV adjusted for sex, age, BMI, ALT, AST, height, habit of exercise, GGT, TC, FPG, HbA1c, SBP, drinking status and smoking status