Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 8;25(1):114–119. doi: 10.4103/aian.aian_711_21

Table 1.

Comparison of demographic details, stroke type, imaging modalities, and outcome between the two stroke groups, young (18-49 years) stroke patients with older (>49 years) patients with stroke

Variables 18-49 years (n=700) n (%)* >49 years (n=2248) n (%)* p value
Gender 0.06
 Men 451 (64) 1360 (61)
 Women 249 (36) 888 (39)
Education <0.001
 Illiterate 51 (13) 276 (22)
 Literate 349 (87) 967 (78)
Occupation <0.0001
 Employed 205 (48) 390 (30)
 Business 53 (12) 168 (13)
 Housewives 135 (31) 463 (35)
 Unemployed 40 (9) 287 (22)
Religion <0.001
 Sikh 142 (34) 579 (44)
 Hindu 257 (62) 712 (54)
 Others 18 (4) 27 (2)
Type of stroke <0.001
 Ischemic stroke 404 (63) 1486 (72)
 Intracranial hemorrhage 214 (34) 573 (27)
 Cerebral venous thrombosis 18 (3) 9 (1)
Diagnosis <0.01
 Clinical Diagnosis alone 32 (5) 58 (3)
 CT scan 294 (48) 860 (43)
 MRI scan 281 (46) 1035 (52)
 CT and MRI scan both 6 (1) 28 (1)
mRS at 28 days follow-up <0.001
 Good outcome 374 (60) 938 (46)
 Poor outcome§ 249 (40) 1085 (54)

* percentage calculated after excluding missing data, less than primary school completed, Muslim, Jain, Christian * percentage calculated after excluding missing data, modified Rankin Scale, mRS: 0-2, § mRS: 3-6