Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 24;15(3):281. doi: 10.3390/ph15030281

Table 2.

The design expert results of all response variables.

Source Size (nm) EE% CDR%
F p-Value F p-Value
Model 416.50 <0.0001 162.22 <0.0001 505.75 <0.0001
X1: GMS amount (mg) 1134.32 <0.0001 670.22 <0.0001 8.19 0.0133
X2: Poloxamer 407 (% w/w) 108.84 <0.0001 13.59 0.0050 173.20 <0.0001
X3: Oleic acid amount (mg) 6.34 0.0257 241.61 <0.0001 1335.85 <0.0001
X1×3 85.47 <0.0001
X12 54.30 <0.0001
X22 43.39 0.0001
X32 14.84 0.0039
Lack of Fit 0.3386 0.9183 0.4527 0.7962 0.9338 0.5748
Model Linear Reduced Quadratic Linear
SD 0.1573 0.0003 1.01
R2 0.9897 0.9921 0.9915
Adequate precision 64.3041 42.7075 72.4640
Predicted R2 0.9845 0.9687 0.9849
Adjusted R2 0.9873 0.9860 0.9895
%CV 1.23 1.98 1.42
Sqrt (PS) = 12.7979 + 1.87247 × X1 − 0.580015 × X2 − 0.140025 × X3.
1/(EE) = 0.0121807 − 0.0024 × X1 + 0.0003 × X2 − 0.0014 × X3 + 0.0012 × X1 .X3 + 0.0009 × X12 + 0.0008 × X22 + 0.0005 × X32.
CDR% = 71.2471 − 1.025 × X1 + 4.7125 × X2 + 13.0875 × X3.