Table 3.
Frequency of ARO accessions detected in this study.
| Distribution of AROs among the Various Sampling Levels | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARO Name a | No. of AROs | Overall Frequency (%) b | Hatchery | Farm | Processing Plant | Retail Outlet |
| aac(3)-IV | 11 | 7.5 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| aac(6‘)-Iaa | 7 | 4.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| aac(6‘)-Iy | 2 | 1.4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| aph(3‘)-Ia | 5 | 3.4 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| aph(4)-Ia | 11 | 7.5 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| blaCTX-M-65 | 10 | 6.8 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| mcr-9.1 | 1 | 0.7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| qacEDelta1 | 12 | 8.2 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 1 |
| sul1 | 12 | 8.2 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 71 | 1 | 59 | 1 | 10 | |
a Antibiotic-resistant ontology name in accordance with the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD) software. b A total of 71 ARO counts were detected in 146 isolates.