Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 13;22(6):2224. doi: 10.3390/s22062224

Table 1.

Summary of related work on COVID-19 identification from blood samples.

Ref. Methods Feature Selection Methods Metrics (Value) Data Samples (COVID-19 Samples)
[42] Ensemble learning extra trees, random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), extreme gradient boosting (ERLX) classifier Manual Accuracy: 99.88%
AUC: 99.38%,
Sensitivity: 98.72%
Specificity: 99.99%
5644
(559)
[47] Categorical gradient boosting (CatBoost), support vector machine (SVM), and LR Manual AUC: 89.9–95.8%
Specificity: 91.5–98.3%
Sensitivity: 55.5–77.8%
5148
(447)
[53] Ensemble learning with RF, LR, XGBoost, Support Vector Machine (SVM), MLP Decision Tree Explainer (DTX) Accuracy
(0.88 ± 0.02)
608
(84)
[39] Artificial Neural Network (ANN) predictive model Pearson and Kendall correlation coefficient Area under curve (AUC) values of 0.953 (0.889–0.982). 151
[35] ANN, RF, gradient boosting trees, LR and SVM NA AUC: 0.85; Sensitivity: 0.68; Specificity: 0.85; Brier Score: 0.16 235
(102)
[54] RF classifier manual Accuracy: 96.95%,
Sensitivity: 95.12%,
Specificity: 96.97%
253
(105)
[55] ANN, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM), Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), CNN-LSTM, and CNN-RNN CNN and LSTM AUC: 0.90, Accuracy: 0.9230, FI-score: 0.93, Precision: 0.9235, Recall: 0.9368 600
(80)
[56] SVM, LR, DT, RF and deep neural network (DNN) Logistic regression (LR) Accuracy: 91%,
Sensitivity: 87%,
AUC: 97.1%,
Specificity: 95%.
921
(361)
[57] ANN, CNN, RNN SMOTE Accuracy: 94.95%,
F1-score: 94.98%, precision: 94.98%, recall: 94.98%,
AUC: 100%
600
(80)
[31] LR Maximum relevance minimum redundancy (mRMR) algorithm Sensitivity: 98%,
Specificity: 91%
110
(51)
[58] LR, DT, RF, gradient boosted decision tree NA Sensitivity: 75.8%,
Specificity: 80.2%,
AUC: 85.3%
3346
(1394)