Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 13;22(6):2224. doi: 10.3390/s22062224

Table 6.

The results of ablation study: performance of the proposed model using different final stage ML classifiers. Best values are shown in bold.

ML Model Accuracy (%) FPR (%) FNR (%) AUC (%) MCC (%) Kappa (%)
Nearest Neighbors 78.9 39.86 11.02 74.56 51.48 50.8
Linear SVM 64.66 100 0 50 0 0
RBF SVM 71.44 79.06 1.72 59.62 26.34 21.66
Decision Tree 94.64 9.36 3.2 93.72 88.24 87.94
Random Forest 90.74 22.38 2.2 87.72 79.54 78.64
Neural Net 65.02 99.04 0 50.48 3.48 1.18
AdaBoost 99.28 2.24 0 98.88 98.36 98.32
ExtraTrees 99.28 0 1.04 99.48 98.4 98.4
Naive Bayes 72.14 54.14 13.78 66.06 35.48 34.26
LDA 70.34 67.62 8.86 61.8 30.08 26.44
QDA 91.44 18.4 3.3 89.14 81.26 80.46
Logistic 65.02 99.04 0 50.48 3.48 1.18
Passive 59.64 60 29.48 55.26 11.48 9.74
Ridge 67.18 92.2 0.52 53.62 17.24 8.82
SGDC 58.96 52.38 34.88 56.36 13.12 15.1