Table 5.
Logistic regression analyses predicting binge drinking and high-risk drinking in total.
| Binge Drinking | High-Risk Drinking | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | Lower 95% CI | Higher 95% CI | OR | Lower 95% CI | Higher 95% CI | |
| Demographic Variables | ||||||
| Age Group | 0.56 *** | 0.38 | 0.82 | 0.97 | 0.55 | 1.72 |
| Education | 0.55 *** | 0.36 | 0.83 | 1.08 | 0.57 | 2.05 |
| Marital Status | 0.88 | 0.60 | 1.31 | 0.59 * | 0.33 | 1.07 |
| Household Income | 1.00 | 0.58 | 1.73 | 2.01 | 0.79 | 5.10 |
| Smoking | 2.92 *** | 1.56 | 5.47 | 1.99 | 0.98 | 4.03 |
| Norms | ||||||
| Descriptive norms | 1.53 *** | 1.34 | 1.75 | 2.83 *** | 2.15 | 3.73 |
| Injunctive norms | 2.94 *** | 1.92 | 4.49 | 2.56 *** | 1.38 | 4.74 |
| Motives | ||||||
| Enhancement | 1.90 *** | 1.42 | 2.54 | 2.08 *** | 1.34 | 3.22 |
| Coping | 0.93 | 0.73 | 1.18 | 0.81 | 0.56 | 1.15 |
| Social | 1.27 * | 1.01 | 1.59 | 1.24 | 0.87 | 1.77 |
| Conformity | 0.75 * | 0.57 | 0.99 | 0.78 | 0.53 | 1.15 |
| Environmental | 0.88 | 0.65 | 1.20 | 1.06 | 0.68 | 1.63 |
| Nagelkerke R2 | 0.35 | 0.37 | ||||
| −2 log likelihood | 841.80 | 417.72 | ||||
Note: Age group (40–59 = 1, 19–39 = 0), education (≥ college graduates = 1, ≤ high school graduates = 0), marital status (married = 1, single/divorced/widow = 0), household income (≥KRW 2000 = 1, ≤ KRW 1999 = 0), smoking (smoker = 1, non-smoker = 0); = 19.8%; OR = odds ratio; * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001.