Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 18;19(6):3602. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063602

Table 1.

Comparison of the fit indices of the four models considered.

Model χ² (df) p(χ²) RMSEA RMSEA 90% CI SRMR CFI TLI
1 1024.68 (558) <0.001 0.066 [0.050–0.071] 0.083 0.912 0.901
2 1487.14 (584) <0.001 0.076 [0.071–0.080] 0.099 0.830 0.817
3 356.74 (288) =0.004 0.030 [0.018–0.039] 0.064 0.981 0.977
4 597.68 (314) <0.001 0.058 [0.051–0.065] 0.083 0.922 0.912

Note. Model 1 = 36 items and 9 correlated factors; Model 2 = 36 items, 2 s-order factors and 9 first-order factors; Model 3 = 27 items and 9 correlated factors; Model 4 = 27 items, 2 s-order factors and 9 first-order factors. RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; CFI = comparative fit index; TLI = Tucker–Lewis index; df = degrees of freedom; CI = confidence interval.