Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 26;12(3):362. doi: 10.3390/jpm12030362

Table 1.

Characteristics of the included observational studies and patients.

Year; Author 2018; Xia 2019; Qi 2020; Xue 2020; Mcguinness
Country China China China USA
Type of study PS Cross-sectional RS RS
Study period 06/2016–08/2017 06/2016–08/2017 01/2002–07/2019 07/2015–06/2018
Inclusion criteria Patients with uterine leiomyoma and adenomyosis treated with hysterectomy and salpingectomy; no hormonal medication within 3 mo; no history of tubal surgery Premenopausal; unilateral or bilateral salpingectomy; complete data; no pregnancy; consent for participation Salpingectomy Surgery for EM by MIS; age < 55; no malignant cases; no previous laparotomy; no previous bil salpingectomy
Main outcomes Ciliary beat frequency (CBF) Characteristics, prevalence, clinical features, pathologic features, predictors of EM Prevalence of tubal EM among groups Prevalence of tubal EM among groups
Compared groups AM without EM vs. EM without AM vs. control (uterine leiomyoma) EM vs. no EM EM vs. BN vs. MT Salpingectomy vs. no salpingectomy
Indication for surgery Leiomyoma, AM, EM Fibroid, ovarian cyst, salpingitis/infertility, hydrosalpinx, malignancy, tubal sterilization, adenomyosis, EM Leiomyoma, adenomyosis, endometrioid cysts, hydrosalpinx, uterine malformation, malignancy EM, pelvic pain, cystic adnexal mass, infertility, fibroids, AUB
Patients (n) 75 (20 vs. 35 vs. 20) 1112 (161 vs. 951) 261 (178 vs. 65 vs. 18) 185 (97 vs. 88)
Patients age (years) 44.4 ± 5.2 a vs. 43.4 ± 5.1 a vs. 47.2 ± 4.8 a
(AM vs. EM vs. control)
44.89 ± 6 a vs. 45.9 ± 5.97 a, p = 0.002 (tubal EM vs. no EM) 44 ± 7 a (total) 41.26 ± 7.45 a vs. 34.24 ± 7.37 a (salpingectomy vs. no salpingectomy)
Other EM sites N/A Ovarian EM
L: 70/R: 53/Bil: 34
Ovarian EM
L: 70/R: 49
N/A
Site of EM (L/R/Bil) N/A 84 (40.37%)/65 (52.17%)/12 (7.45%), p < 0.005 (for L/R) 168 (55.08%)/93 (30.49%)/44 (14.43%), p < 0.001 (for L/R) N/A
Prevalence of tubal EM 24/35 (69%) for EM group 161/1112 (14.48%) EM group: 178 (68.2%)
BN group: 65 (24.9%)
MT group: 18 (6.9%)
34/97 (35%) salpingectomy group vs. 8/88 (9%) no salpingectomy group
Location in tube (tubal site/histologic layer) N/A Proximal: 78 (48.45%) Distal: 78 (48.45%) Proximal + distal: 5 (3.1%)/
Mucosa: 88 (54.66%)
Myosalpinx: 10 (6.21%)
Serosa: 52 (32.3%)
Mucosa + serosa: 11 (6.83%)
N/A N/A
Predisposing factors N/A Previous EM, multi-organ EM, uterine seromuscular EM, severity of pelvic EM, young age, AUB, previous tubal ligation N/A N/A

RS: retrospective, EM: endometriosis, AM: adenomyosis, BN: benign disease, MT: malignant disease, MIS: minimally invasive surgery, AUB: abnormal uterine bleeding, PID: pelvic inflammatory disease, IUD: intrauterine device, L: left, R: right, Bil: bilateral, a Mean ± SD, N/A: not available.