Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 18;2022:5009395. doi: 10.1155/2022/5009395

Table 4.

Adjusted odds ratio of associating factors for predicting osteoporosis and osteopenia in female patients.

Model Model 1
Odds ratio (95% CI)
P value
Model 2
Odds ratio (95% CI)
P value
Model 3
Odds ratio (95% CI)
P value
Total (n = 182) MACS (n = 99) Total cases (n = 182) MACS (n = 99) Total (n = 182)
Cortisol excessa 2.561
(1.142–5.742)
0.022
1.686
(0.687–4.140)
0.254
1.124
(1.063–1.189)
<0.001
1.129
(1.005–1.267)
0.041
3.833
(1.829–8.030)
<0.001
Age, years. 1.010
(0.987–1.035)
0.386
1.041
(1.002–1.083)
0.041
1.031
(1.004–1.059)
0.027
1.047
(1.006–1.090)
0.024
1.025
(0.998–1.052)
0.067
BMI, kg/m2 0.947
(0.886–1.012)
0.109
0.972
(0.894–1.057)
0.508
0.941
(0.877–1.009)
0.086
0.963
(0.884–1.049)
0.390
0.931
(0.867–1.000)
0.051

aCortisol excess was evaluated by positivity of 1 mg DST cortisol level >5.0 µg/dL (vs. 1 mg DST cortisol level of 1.9–5.0 μg/dL) in model 1, continuous valuables of 1 mg DST cortisol (µg/dL) in model 2, and the presence of cushingoid features in model 3. Values were adjusted by age and BMI. All P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. BMI, body mass index; CI, confidential interval; DST, overnight dexamethasone suppression test; MACS, mild autonomous cortisol secretion.