Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 24;15(2):286–300. doi: 10.1007/s12328-021-01575-4

Table 5.

Characteristics of included studies

Study Publication year Journal Study type Total sample size Study demographic Gold standard
Adams et al. [13] 2015 Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Retrospective cohort 498 USA ERCP
Aleknaite et al. [28] 2018 United European Gastroenterology Journal Retrospective cohort 350 Lithuania ERCP & IOC
Bose et al. [32] 2001 Surgery Today Prospective cohort 88 India ERCP & IOC
Chan et al. [33] 2008 The American Journal of Surgery Retrospective cohort 182 USA ERCP
Chisholm et al. [30] 2019 Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Prospective cohort 366 USA ERCP
He et al. [21] 2017 Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Prospective cohort 2724 China ERCP
Jagtap et al. [16] 2020 Endoscopy Prospective cohort 1042 India ERCP
Jeon et al. [25] 2017 Gut and Liver Retrospective cohort 200 Korea ERCP
Kamath et al. [27] 2016 Indian Journal of Gastroenterology Prospective cohort 275 Saudi Arabia ERCP
Kuzu et al. [22] 2017 HPB Retrospective cohort 1074 Turkey ERCP
Lee et al. [29] 2019 Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International Retrospective cohort 754 Korea ERCP
Magalhaes et al. [18] 2015 World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Retrospective cohort 268 Portugal ERCP
Nárvaez Rivera et al. [14] 2016 Spanish Journal of Gastroenterology Prospective cohort 256 Spain ERCP
Panda et al. [23] 2018 World Journal of Surgery Retrospective cohort 152 USA ERCP
Rahal et al. [34] 2017 European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology Retrospective cohort 354 Lebanon ERCP & IOC
Rubin et al. [19] 2013 Digestive Endoscopy Retrospective cohort 1080 USA ERCP
Sethi et al. [26] 2016 Digestive Endoscopy Prospective cohort 336 USA ERCP
Suarez et al. [24] 2016 Surgical Endoscopy Prospective cohort 173 USA ERCP
Videhult et al. [17] 2011 HPB Prospective cohort 1171 Sweden IOC
Yang et al. [31] 2008 Surgical Endoscopy Retrospective cohort 2225 USA Cholecystectomy

Sample sizes reported were total sample sizes, including patients not entirely of (suspected) CDL patients. Specific relevant sample size is reported in Table 2, 3, 4 for each specific predictor