Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 19;2022:4276175. doi: 10.1155/2022/4276175

Table 2.

CBT and comparison group information.

Author year Groups Type of CBT CBT sessions CBT duration (W) Comparison type
Balser 1997 CBT + UC vs. UC Face-to-face 12 sessions  120 min 12 UC: various forms of medical treatment such as pain medication, nerve blocks, transcutaneous electrical stimulation, and physical therapy, but not surgery.

Beth 2021 CBT vs. PE CBT vs. ER Face-to-face 8 sessions  120 min 8 PE: pain education, matched to empowered relief on 4 key factors: duration, structure, format, and site. ER: empowered relief consists of a single-session, 2-hour pain class that includes pain neuroscience education, mindfulness principles, and CBT skills.

Buhrman 2004 CBT vs. WL Internet-based Webpages 8 WL: nonspecific treatment control had been used instead of a waiting list.

Carpenter 2012 CBT vs. WL Internet-based Webpages 3 WL: nonspecific treatment control had been used instead of a waiting list.

Cherkin 2016 CBT vs. UC, CBT vs. MBSR Face-to-face 2 sessions  120 min  8 W 8 UC: free to seek whatever treatment but no MBSR training or CBT. MBSR: mindfulness-based stress reduction, a program does not focus specifically on a particular condition such as pain.

Christiansen 2010 CBT + UC vs. UC Face-to-face 2 sessions  30 min 3 UC: standard outpatient back pain program.

Godfrey 2020 ACT + PT vs. PT Face-to-face and telephone call 3 sessions   (60 min  2 + 20 min) 6 PT: usual physical therapy including manual therapy techniques.

Gould 2020 CBT + placebo vs. placebo Face-to-face 6 sessions (1  90 min + 5  60 min) 8 Placebo: a dose of benztropine mesylate 0.125 mg daily was chosen.

Harris 2017 BI vs. BI + CBT vs. BI + PE Face-to-face 7 sessions  90 min 12 BI: brief intervention, a brief cognitive, clinical examination program addressing pain and fear avoidance. PE: Group physical exercise consisted of strength and endurance training and relaxation.

Ivar brox 2003 Surgery vs. CBT + PT Face-to-face NA 12 Surgery: posterolateral fusion with transpedicular screws of the L4–L5 segment and/or the L5–S1 segment. PT: customarily prescribed physiotherapy, including exercises.

Johnson 2007 CBT + UC vs. UC Face-to-face and leaflet 8 sessions  120 min 6 UC: received no further intervention and continued to be treated as usual.

Khan 2014 CBT + exercise vs. exercise Face-to-face 3 sessions  12  ? min 12 Exercise: general exercise protocol under the supervision of a physical therapist.

Monticone 2013 CBT + exercise vs. exercise Face-to-face 5  60 min + 12  60 min 54 Exercise: general exercise protocol under the supervision of a physical therapist.

Newton 1995 CBT vs. EMGBF vs. WL Face-to-face 5  90 min 4 EMGBF: electromyographic biofeedback, consisted firstly of a psychoeducational session, then introduced to the pain-tension-pain cycle. WL: nonspecific treatment control had been used instead of a waiting list.

Petrozzi 2019 CBT + PT vs. PT Internet-based 5 modules, online-based 8 PT: included manual therapy in combination with other modalities such as advice, education, and exercise.

Pincus 2015 CBT vs. PT Face-to-face 8 sessions  50 min 12 PT: physiotherapy was delivered as usual within services, with the stipulation that it included at least 60% exercise.

Reme 2016 BI + CBT vs. BI Audiotaped 7 sessions  ? min 8 BI: brief intervention, a brief cognitive, clinical examination program based on a noninjury model addressing pain and fear avoidance, where return to normal activity and work is the main goal.

Rutledge 2018a CBT vs. UC Text-based 12 sessions (1  120 min + 11  30 min) 8 UC: controlled for nonspecific benefits of therapy.

Rutledge 2018b CBT vs. UC Telephone-based 12 sessions (1  120 min + 11  30 min) 8 UC: controlled for nonspecific benefits of therapy.

Schweikert 2006 CBT + UC vs. UC Face-to-face 6 sessions  90 min 3 UC: standardized conventional 3-week inpatient rehabilitation program consisting of daily physiotherapy, massage of the spinal region, electrotherapeutical measures, 1-hour seminar regarding back training, twice-daily exercise program.

Smeets 2006 CBT vs. PT, CBT vs. WL Face-to-face 18 sessions, total: 11.5  60 min 10 PT: aerobic training on a bicycle and strength and endurance training. WL: not allowed to participate in diagnostic or therapeutic procedures because of their CLBP.

Turner 2016 CBT vs. UC, CBT vs. MBSR Face-to-face 2 sessions  120 min  8 W 8 UC: free to seek whatever treatment but no MBSR training or CBT. MBSR: mindfulness-based stress reduction: a program does not focus specifically on a particular condition such as pain.

UC: usual care; PE: pain education; ER: empowered relief; WL: waiting-list; PT: physical therapy; BI: brief intervention; MBSR: mindfulness-based stress reduction; EMGBF: electromyographic biofeedback.