Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2021 Sep 28;29(1):3–14. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2021.1982990

Appendix 3.

Fit statistics for the class formation by race/ethnicity

Number of
Classes
Log-
likelihood
Adjusted
BIC
AIC Entropy Vuong-Lo-Mendell-
Rubin p-value
2015 & 2018 Black Women Sample (N=438)
1 −2605.262 5245.428 5234.524 1
2 −2298.822 4670.362 4647.644 0.792 0.002
3 −2232.804 4576.138 4541.607 0.784 0.0003
4 −2191.635 4531.614 4485.27 0.824 0.2247
5 −2158.379 4502.917 4444.758 0.833 0.3352
6 −2138.152 4500.275 4430.303 0.849 0.0882
2015 & 2018 Asian Women Sample (N=940)
1 −4527.201 9098.442 9078.402 1
2 −4128.23 8348.208 8306.459 0.742 0
3 −4042.903 8225.264 8161.806 0.775 0.0003
4 −3988.769 8164.705 8079.538 0.789 0.0039
5 −3936.568 8108.013 8001.136 0.795 0.2186
2015 & 2018 Latina Women Sample (N=453)
1 −2816.242 5667.791 5656.484 1
2 −2534.075 5141.707 5118.151 0.777 0
3 −2467.217 5046.24 5010.435 0.818 0.0017
4 −2414.632 4979.318 4931.263 0.812 0.0105
5 −2389.858 4968.02 4907.717 0.824 0.2856
2015 & 2018 White Women Sample (N=7,458)
1 −39664.957 79398.785 79353.914 1
2 −35822.863 71789.207 71695.726 0.776 0
3 −34946.427 70110.945 69968.854 0.804 0
4 −34465.685 69224.072 69033.37 0.759 0.005
5 −34154.398 68676.109 68436.796 0.767 0
6 −33984.996 68411.914 68123.991 0.76 0
7 −33884.444 68285.421 67948.888 0.785 0.0011
8 −33792.441 68176.025 67790.881 0.769 0.0137

Note: Final solutions are in bold. AIC=Akaike information criterion; BIC=Bayesian information criterion