Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 23;34:75–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.03.009

Table 1.

Cetuximab – Bio-Radiotherapy Phase III Trials.

Trials Study
years
Study
arms
Chemo
therapy
HPV positive a Median F/U
(years)
Progression free survival Overall survival Comment
IMCL 9815 1999–02 RT + CET
RT
41% 4.5 55% v/s 45%b,e Cetuximab is
better
RTOG 0522 2005–09 RT + CIS + CET
RT + CIS
3 weekly
Cisplatin
70% 3.8 59% v/s 61%c,e 76% v/s 72%c,e No benefit
More toxicity
GORTEC 2007–01 2008–14 RT + CT + CET
RT + CET
Carboplatin
+5 FU
21% 4.4 53% v/s 40%b,e 61% v/s 55%c,e No OS benefit
CT - different
GORTEC 2007–02 2009–13 TPF → RT + CET
RT + CT
Carboplatin
+5 FU
21% 2.8 32% v/s 32%c,e 38% v/s 42%c,e No benefit
More toxicity
RTOG 1016 2011–14 RT + CET
RT + CIS
3 weekly
Cisplatin
100% 4.5 67% v/s 79%b,f 78% v/s 85%b,f Cetuximab is
Detrimental
DE-ESCALATE 2012–16 RT + CET
RT + CIS
3 weekly
Cisplatin
100% 2.1 89% v/s 97%b,d Cetuximab is
Detrimental
ARTSCAN III 2013–18 RT + CET
RT + CIS
Weekly
Cisplatin
(40 mg/m2)
90% 3.1 67% v/s 88%b,e 78% v/s 88%c,e No benefit of Cetuximab
TROG 12.01 2013–18 RT + CET
RT + CIS
Weekly
Cisplatin
(40 mg/m2)
100% 4.1 80% v/s 93% b,e Cetuximab is
Detrimental

CET – Cetuximab; CIS – Cisplatin; CT – Chemotherapy; TPF – Docetaxel, Cisplatin and 5-Fluoro Uracil.

a = among oropharyngeal primary; b = p value significant; c = p value not significant; d = 2Y; e = 3Y, f = 5Y.