Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 5;33(4):374–384. doi: 10.1177/09564624211069236

Table 2.

Distribution of HIV testing and baseline and adjusted logistic regression models for ever having an HIV test among refugee and displaced youth aged 16–24 years recruited for the Tushirikiane trial in Kampala, Uganda (n = 446).

Never had HIV test Ever had HIV test Baseline model a Adjusted model b
N (%), or mean (SD.) N (%), or mean (SD.) OR (95% CI) p-value c OR (95% CI) p-value c
Total n = 252 n = 194
Socio-demographic variables
 Age, years 19.6 (2.3) 20.5 (2.5) 1.17 (1.08–1.27) <0.001 1.00 (0.90–1.11) 0.956
 Gender 0.668 0.884
  Cisgender man 128 (50.8) 100 (51.6) Ref Ref
  Cisgender woman 124 (49.2) 94 (48.4) 0.92 (0.63–1.35) 0.97 (0.61–1.52)
 Length of time in Uganda 0.521
  <1 year 9 (3.6) 7 (3.6) Ref
  1–5 years 136 (54.0) 102 (52.6) 1.05 (0.37–2.94)
  6–10 years 78 (31.0) 53 (27.3) 0.96 (0.33–2.76)
  >10 years 29 (11.5) 32 (16.5) 1.52 (0.50–4.65)
Material context
 Employment status <0.001 <0.001
  No employment 93 (37.7) 65 (34.0) Ref Ref
  Student 104 (42.1) 55 (28.8) 0.59 (0.36–0.97) 0.60 (0.35–1.03)
  Employed (paid/unpaid) 50 (20.2) 71 (37.2) 1.88 (1.14–3.08) 1.79 (1.03–3.10)
 Income security 0.246
  Never 129 (51.4) 79 (40.9) Ref
  Sometimes 95 (37.9) 79 (40.9) 1.15 (0.73–1.83)
  Always 27 (10.8) 35 (18.1) 1.70 (0.99–3.19)
 Highest level of education 0.002 <0.001
  Less than secondary 65 (26.2) 45 (23.3) Ref Ref
  Some secondary 114 (46.0) 66 (34.2) 0.89 (0.54–1.45) 0.88 (0.51–1.52)
  Secondary + 69 (27.8) 82 (42.5) 1.89 (1.34–3.13) 2.30 (1.27–4.17)
Relational context
 Children <0.001 0.052
  No 238 (94.4) 164 (84.5) Ref Ref
  Yes 14 (5.6) 30 (15.5) 3.19 (1.62–6.28) 2.17 (0.98–4.81)
 Relationship status 0.044 0.333
  No current partner 122 (48.6) 67 (35.1) Ref Ref
  Dating one partner/married 93 (37.1) 89 (46.6) 1.64 (1.07–2.50) 1.34 (0.84–2.13)
  Casual dating/multiple partners 36 (14.3) 35 (18.3) 1.68 (0.96–2.93) 1.49 (0.80–2.78)
 Social Provisions Scale 66.2 (5.8) 66.9 (6.3) 1.01 (0.98–1.04) 0.615
Symbolic context
 Sexual Relationship Power Scale 41.8 (9.3) 42.4 (8.7) 1.00 (0.98–1.02) 0.998
 Condom Use Self-Efficacy 13.9 (5.5) 14.7 (4.6) 1.04 (1.00–1.08) 0.043 1.01 (0.96–1.05) 0.738
 Experienced physical IPV <0.001 0.005
  Never 244 (96.8) 173 (89.2) Ref Ref
  Ever 8 (3.2) 21 (10.8) 4.52 (1.92–10.7) 3.61 (1.43–9.10)
 Experienced sexual IPV 0.083
  Never 235 (93.3) 172 (88.7) Ref
  Ever 17 (6.8) 22 (11.3) 1.80 (0.92–3.52)
 HIV-related Stigma Scale 21.0 (5.7) 21.3 (5.6) 1.00 (0.97–1.04) 0.886
 Adolescent SRH stigma 9.0 (3.4) 9.3 (3.0) 1.00 (0.94–1.07) 0.902

Note: SD, standard deviation; OR, odds ratio; ref, reference; IPV, intimate partner violence; SRH, sexual and reproductive health. Participants identifying as transgender (n = 3) are excluded due to small numbers.

aBaseline model conducted using logistic regression controlling for settlement as an a priori covariate to control for clustering.

bAdjusted model conducted using logistic regression controlling for settlement and gender a priori and all significant baseline model variables.

cP-values calculated from likelihood ratio test.