Pitkin 2000.
Methods | Before and after study; date, volume and page numbers of articles were masked and were numbered accoridng to a computer‐ generated set of random numbers | |
Data | 100 articles; first 50 original contributions in JAMA 1998;278 and last 50 original contributions in JAMA 1998;280 | |
Comparisons | Quality improvement initiative in JAMA; | |
Outcomes | Overall deficiencies in abstracts; non‐trivial deficiencies; data inconsistent between abstract and text; both above 2 deficiencies; unjustified conclusions | |
Notes | k = 0.89 for agreement between the 2 evaluators |