Table 2.
Suggested principles for population-based screening
| Wilson and Jungner 1968 | Andermann et al. 2008 |
|---|---|
| 1. The condition sought should be an important health problem. | 1. The screening program should respond to recognized need. |
| 2. There should be an accepted treatment for patients with recognized disease. | 2. The objectives of screening should be defined at the outset. |
| 3. Facilities for diagnosis and treatment should be available. | 3. There should be a defined target population. |
| 4. There should be a recognizable latent or early symptomatic stage. | 4. There should be scientific evidence of screening program effectiveness. |
| 5. There should be a suitable test or examination. | 5. The program should integrate education, testing, clinical services and program management. There should be quality assurance, with mechanisms to minimize potential risks of screening. |
| 6. The test should be acceptable to the population. | |
| 7. The natural history of the condition, including development from latent to declared disease, should be adequately understood. | 6. The program should ensure informed choice, confidentiality, and respect for autonomy. |
| 8. There should be an agreed policy on whom to treat as patients. | 7. The program should promote equity and access to screening for the entire target population. |
| 9. The cost of case finding (including diagnosis and treatment of patients diagnosed) should be economically balanced in relation to possible expenditure on medical care as a whole. | 8. Program evaluation should be planned from the outset. |
| 10. Case finding should be a continuing process and not a “once and for all” project. | 9. The overall benefits of screening should outweigh the harm. |