Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 28;46:e11. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2022.11

TABLE 2. Comparison of the sensitivity of the genus-specific assays and the species-specific assays for detecting Plasmodium, by species.

Test and sensitivity

Comparison of genus-specific assays

Quantitative PCR

P. falciparum

P. vivax

P. malariae

P. ovale

Positive

Negative

Positive

Negative

Positive

Negative

Positive

Negative

alt-Gen

18

6

29

0

6

0

ND

 

0

0

0

0

0

0

 

Sensitivity (95% CI)

100% (82.41% to 100%)

100% (88.3% to 100%)

100% (60.97% to 100%)b

ND

ƙ

0.5

1.0

1.0

 

McNemar’s test

P = 0.04a

NA

NA

 

Test and sensitivity

Comparison of species-specific assays

Nested PCR

P. falciparum

P. vivax

P. malariae

P. ovale

Positive

Negative

Positive

Negative

Positive

Negative

Positive

Negative

alt-S&T

31

0

31

0

30

0

6

0

 

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Sensitivity (95% CI)

93.94% (80.39% to 98.32%)

100% (88.97% to 100%)

100% (86.65% to 100%)

100% (60.97% to 100)b

ƙ

0.8

1.0

1.0

1.0

McNemar’s test

P = 0.4795

NA

P = 1.00

NA

alt-Gen: RealStar® Malaria PCR Kit 1.0; alt-S&T: RealStar® Malaria Screen & Type PCR Kit; CI: confidence interval; NA: not applicable; ND: not done; PCR: polymerase chain reaction.

a

The result is statistically significant.

b

The large width of the confidence interval is due to the small number of samples.

Source: Table 2 was created by the authors based on the results of the study.