TABLE 1.
Confirmatory factor analyses fit indices for models with five to two factors for total, Italian, and Belgian sample.
Model & sample | χ2 | Df | p | CFI | ΔCFI | RMSEA | ΔRMSEA | SRMR | BIC | ΔBIC | |
A. Five-factor a, b | 135.37 | 80 | 0.965 | 0.038 | 0.045 | 20,360 | |||||
Italian | 104.92 | 80 | 0.032 | 0.974 | 0.036 | 0.052 | 9,678 | ||||
Belgian | 199.68 | 80 | < 0.001 | 0.940 | 0.047 | 0.046 | 30,030 | ||||
B. Three-factor a,c | 305.87 | 87 | 0.861 | −0.104 | 0.073 | + 0.035 | 0.063 | 20,530 | + 170 | ||
Italian | 177.47 | 87 | < 0.001 | 0.905 | −0.069 | 0.067 | + 0.031 | 0.063 | 9,727 | + 49 | |
Belgian | 462.12 | 87 | < 0.001 | 0.812 | −0.128 | 0.080 | + 0.033 | 0.067 | 30,320 | + 290 | |
C.Three-factor a,d | 215.20 | 87 | 0.919 | −0.046 | 0.056 | + 0.018 | 0.053 | 20,420 | + 60 | ||
Italian | 174.93 | 87 | < 0.001 | 0.908 | −0.066 | 0.066 | + 0.030 | 0.061 | 9,727 | + 49 | |
Belgian | 282.49 | 87 | < 0.001 | 0.902 | −0.038 | 0.058 | + 0.011 | 0.053 | 30,093 | + 63 | |
D. Two-factor a,e | 350.46 | 89 | 0.834 | −0.131 | 0.079 | + 0.041 | 0.066 | 20,578 | + 218 | ||
Italian | 209.86 | 89 | < 0.001 | 0.874 | −0.100 | 0.076 | + 0.040 | 0.066 | 9,758 | + 80 | |
Belgian | 514.78 | 89 | < 0.001 | 0.787 | −0.153 | 0.085 | + 0.038 | 0.069 | 30,375 | + 345 |
Ntotal sample, = 470; nItalian sample = 235; nBelgian sample = 667. CFI, Comparative fit index; RMSEA, Root mean square error of approximation; SRMR, Standardized root mean square residual; BIC, Bayesian information criterion. CFI, RMSEA, and BIC differences are relative to the five-factor baseline model and between the respective samples. a These model indicators represent the fit indices of the total sample. b Model A consisted of five factors: Non-Intervention, Disciplinary Methods, Group Discussion, Mediation, and Victim Support. c Model B consisted of three factors: not intervening (i.e., scale Non-Intervention), supportive/relational interventions (i.e., scales Group Discussion, Mediation, and Victim Support), and authoritarian interventions (i.e., scale Disciplinary Methods). d Model C consisted of three factors: not intervening (i.e., scale Non-Intervention), individual bully and/or victim interventions (i.e., scales Disciplinary Methods, Mediation, and Victim Support), and class group interventions (i.e., scale Group Discussion). e Model D consisted of two factors: not intervening (i.e., scale Non-Intervention) and all actual interventions (i.e., scales Disciplinary Methods, Group Discussion, Mediation, and Victim Support).