Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 10;13:818494. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.818494

Table 1.

The basic characteristics of the included studies.

References Region Sample size
(Male/Female)
Age
range/Population
Study design Assessment scales r P Study quality scores
Internet addiction Interpersonal relationship
Liu (33) Wuhan 341 (169/172) College students Cross-sectional CIAS-R ICDS 0.397 <0.01 5
Wang et al. (34) Anhui 1,232 (806/426) College students Cross-sectional CIAS-R ICDS 0.381 <0.01 5
Zhang (a) et al. (35) Anhui 177 (88/89) College students Cross-sectional YIAT ICDS 0.238 <0.01 6
Zhang (b) et al. (24) Jiangsu 389 (226/163) 18–24 Cross-sectional CIAS ICDS 0.356 <0.001 6
Chen et al. (36) Shandong 368 (191/177) College students Cross-sectional YIAT ICDS 0.32 <0.01 6
Zheng et al. (49) Guangdong 657 (289/368) 17–23/college students Case-control CIAS-R ICDS 0.42 <0.01 6
Zhang et al. (37) Beijing 176 (92/84) 20–29/college students Cross-sectional CIAS-R ICDS 0.375 <0.01 5
Yuan (50) Hunan 832 (372/460) 14–19/middle school students Case-control IAII ICDS 0.336 <0.01 7
Wu et al. (38) Dalian 201 (94/107) College students Cross-sectional CIAS ICDS 0.227 <0.05 5
Liu et al. (39) Hebei 490 College students Cross-sectional CIAS-R ICDS 0.470 <0.01 6
Yang (51) Shandong 723 (285/438) College students Case-control MPATS ICDS 0.29 <0.01 7
Liao et al. (52) Jiangxi 472 (218/254) 18–25/college students Case-control MPATS ICDS 0.349 <0.01 7
Wang et al. (21) Guangxi 348 College students Cross-sectional MPATS ICDS 0.382 <0.01 5
Ye (40) Anhui 871 (538/333) College students Cross-sectional MPDS ICDS 0.333 <0.001 7
Tan (53) Hunan 524 (193/331) College students Case-control APIUS ICDS 0.403 <0.01 7
Liu et al. (54) Sichuan 200 (73/127) College students Case-control MPATS ICDS 0.345 <0.001 7
Lai (41) Jiangxi 560 (265/295) 17–24/college students Cross-sectional MPATS ICDS 0.349 <0.01 6
Tang et al. (42) Guangxi 780 (376/404) College students Cross-sectional MPATS ICDS 0.32 <0.01 7
Aruna (44) Heilongjiang 513 (339/174) College students Cross-sectional MPAI ICDS 0.414 <0.001 7
Ma et al. (46) Henan 798 (204/594) College students Cross-sectional MPATS ICDS 0.329 <0.001 7
Su et al. (48) Shanxi 943 18–22/college students Cross-sectional MPATS ICDS 0.394 <0.01 8
Kong et al. (47) Guizhou 479 (168/311) College students Cross-sectional YIAT ICDS 0.31 <0.01 6
He (45) Zhejiang 1,075 (480/595) Middle school students Cross-sectional MPATS ICDS 0.37 <0.01 6
Seo et al. (8) Seoul, Korea 676 (378/297) 12–17/middle school students Cross-sectional IAT (Korean version) The Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (Korean version) 0.425 <0.001 6
Cen et al. (55) Guizhou 403 (198/205) 21.05 ±1.04/college students Case-control YIAT ICDS 0.776 <0.01 7
Wang (43) Guangdong 410 (156/254) 13.46 ± 1.22/middle school students Cross-sectional MPAI ICDS −0.323 <0.01 7

CIAS-R, revised chen internet addiction scale; YIAT, the young internet addiction test; CIAS, chen internet addiction scale; IAII, internet addiction impairment indexes; MPATS, mobile phone addiction tendency scale; APIUS, adolescent pathological internet use scale; MPAI, mobile phone addiction index; MPDS, mobile phone dependence scale; APIUS, adolescent pathological internet use scale; ICDS, interpersonal comprehensive diagnostic scale.