Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 26;127(5):484–489. doi: 10.1007/s11547-022-01485-6

Table 1.

Characteristics and proportion of breast centres reporting the provision of active follow-up to breast cancer patients in their catchment area and, specifically, of a screening-led active follow-up (n = 82)

Breast centre characteristic Total no. Time interval since diagnosis
< 5 years 5–10 years > 10 years
Active FU, no. (%)a Screening-led active FU, no. (%)a Active FU, no. (%) Screening-led active FU, no. (%) Active FU, no. (%) Screening-led active FU, no. (%)
Geographic area
North 53 40 (75) 2 (4) 40 (75) 4 (8) 35 (66) 9 (17)
Centre 19 11 (58) 0 (0) 11 (58) 0 (0) 11 (58) 4 (21)
South 10 5 (50) 0 (0) 5 (50) 0 (0) 3 (30) 1 (10)
Hospital classification
Public hospital 52 37 (71) 2 (4) 36 (69) 3 (6) 33 (63) 10 (19)
Private accredited hospital 5 4 (80) 0 (0) 4 (80) 1 (20) 4 (80) 1 (20)
IRCCS and AOU 14 7 (50) 0 (0) 7 (50) 0 (0) 7 (50) 3 (21)
Private accredited IRCCS 11 8 (73) 0 (0) 9 (82) 0 (0) 5 (45) 0 (0)
No. of new BC cases per yearb
< 345 41 29 (71) 2 (5) 30 (73) 3 (7) 28 (68) 7 (17)
≥ 345 41 27 (66) 0 (0) 26 (63) 1 (2) 21 (51) 7 (17)
No. of mammograms per yearb
< 15,000 42 25 (60) 0 (0) 26 (62) 2 (5) 21 (50) 5 (12)
≥ 15,000 40 31 (78) 2 (5) 30 (75) 2 (5) 28 (70) 9 (23)
BCCert certification
No 58 36 (62) 2 (3) 36 (62) 3 (5) 33 (57) 12 (21)
Yes 24 20 (83) 0 (0) 20 (83) 1 (4) 16 (67) 2 (8)

BC Breast cancer, BCCert European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists’ Breast Centres Certification, FU follow-up, IRCCS Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (non-University Research Hospital), AOU Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria (University Hospital)

aNon-responses on the presence of active follow-up and on the role of the screening programme were pooled with negative responses

bDichotomised by the median value