Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 28;13:1648. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29185-9

Table 3.

Summary statistics for the Generalization to novel stimuli across animals and the four conditions (Fig. 4).

Animal Task Sound Trials Hit Rate Binomial test on performance (Fig. 4c)
N Degrees of freedom Adjusted p-value
a Twitter vs Tone Tone 530 0.93 529 1 3.75E−100
Phee vs Tone Tone 186 0.83 183 1 1.78E−20
Juvenile vs Twitter Juvenile 333 0.6 333 1 8.72E−03
Phee vs Tone Phee 185 0.84 184 1 1.94E−21
Twitter vs Tone Twitter 535 0.84 528 1 5.05E−61
Juvenile vs Twitter Twitter 335 0.61 334 1 4.65E–04
Noise vs Twitter Twitter 54 0.57 54 1 1
Noise vs Twitter Noise 54 0.67 54 1 3.97E–01
b Twitter vs Tone Tone 200 0.81 198 1 5.52E–19
Phee vs Tone Tone 320 0.66 315 1 1.59E–08
Juvenile vs Twitter Juvenile 218 0.44 217 1 1
Phee vs Tone Phee 316 0.67 314 1 1
Twitter vs Tone Twitter 191 0.88 190 1 9.98E–28
Juvenile vs Twitter Twitter 214 0.7 214 1 7.76E–08
Noise vs Twitter Twitter 150 0.85 149 1 7.60E–18
Noise vs Twitter Noise 154 0.36 146 1 1
d Twitter vs Tone Tone 389 0.93 389 1 7.86E–76
Phee vs Tone Tone 328 0.87 324 1 3.57E–45
Juvenile vs Twitter Juvenile 40 0.63 33 1 9.10E–02
Phee vs Tone Phee 336 0.9 335 1 2.74E–53
Twitter vs Tone Twitter 386 0.91 386 1 1.87E–66
Juvenile vs Twitter Twitter 33 0.55 33 1 1
Noise vs Twitter Twitter 129 0.87 129 1 4.89E–17
Noise vs Twitter Noise 130 0.9 129 1 1.71E–21
i Twitter vs Tone Tone 129 0.79 128 1 1.56E–10
Phee vs Tone* Tone 9 0.89 9 1 7.81E–01
Juvenile vs Twitter* Juvenile 1 1 1 1 1
Phee vs Tone* Phee 10 0.7 10 1 1
Twitter vs Tone Twitter 120 0.8 119 1 1.71E–10
Juvenile vs Twitter* Twitter 4 0.5 4 1 1
Noise vs Twitter Twitter 142 0.76 141 1 3.37E–09
Noise vs Twitter Noise 144 0.88 143 1 2.50E–21
k Twitter vs Tone Tone 590 0.79 588 1 7.60E–46
Phee vs Tone Tone 597 0.88 596 1 5.35E–87
Juvenile vs Twitter Juvenile 751 0.71 749 1 2.69E–29
Phee vs Tone Phee 632 0.82 629 1 4.03E–63
Twitter vs Tone Twitter 601 0.79 598 1 5.14E–49
Juvenile vs Twitter Twitter 787 0.7 785 1 1.25E–28
Noise vs Twitter Twitter 541 0.64 532 1 7.54E–11
Noise vs Twitter Noise 624 0.47 615 1 1

Columns under “ Binomial test on performance (Fig. 4c)” report information regarding the statistical deviations of performance (across stimuli and task type) from a theoretically expected distribution of observations (one-sided), with p-values adjusted with a post-hoc Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Significant values are indicated in bold font. Stars behind the comparison in the column "Task" indicate low trial numbers performed suggesting a low statistical power.