Table 3.
Animal | Task | Sound | Trials | Hit Rate | Binomial test on performance (Fig. 4c) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | Degrees of freedom | Adjusted p-value | |||||
a | Twitter vs Tone | Tone | 530 | 0.93 | 529 | 1 | 3.75E−100 |
Phee vs Tone | Tone | 186 | 0.83 | 183 | 1 | 1.78E−20 | |
Juvenile vs Twitter | Juvenile | 333 | 0.6 | 333 | 1 | 8.72E−03 | |
Phee vs Tone | Phee | 185 | 0.84 | 184 | 1 | 1.94E−21 | |
Twitter vs Tone | 535 | 0.84 | 528 | 1 | 5.05E−61 | ||
Juvenile vs Twitter | 335 | 0.61 | 334 | 1 | 4.65E–04 | ||
Noise vs Twitter | 54 | 0.57 | 54 | 1 | 1 | ||
Noise vs Twitter | Noise | 54 | 0.67 | 54 | 1 | 3.97E–01 | |
b | Twitter vs Tone | Tone | 200 | 0.81 | 198 | 1 | 5.52E–19 |
Phee vs Tone | Tone | 320 | 0.66 | 315 | 1 | 1.59E–08 | |
Juvenile vs Twitter | Juvenile | 218 | 0.44 | 217 | 1 | 1 | |
Phee vs Tone | Phee | 316 | 0.67 | 314 | 1 | 1 | |
Twitter vs Tone | 191 | 0.88 | 190 | 1 | 9.98E–28 | ||
Juvenile vs Twitter | 214 | 0.7 | 214 | 1 | 7.76E–08 | ||
Noise vs Twitter | 150 | 0.85 | 149 | 1 | 7.60E–18 | ||
Noise vs Twitter | Noise | 154 | 0.36 | 146 | 1 | 1 | |
d | Twitter vs Tone | Tone | 389 | 0.93 | 389 | 1 | 7.86E–76 |
Phee vs Tone | Tone | 328 | 0.87 | 324 | 1 | 3.57E–45 | |
Juvenile vs Twitter | Juvenile | 40 | 0.63 | 33 | 1 | 9.10E–02 | |
Phee vs Tone | Phee | 336 | 0.9 | 335 | 1 | 2.74E–53 | |
Twitter vs Tone | 386 | 0.91 | 386 | 1 | 1.87E–66 | ||
Juvenile vs Twitter | 33 | 0.55 | 33 | 1 | 1 | ||
Noise vs Twitter | 129 | 0.87 | 129 | 1 | 4.89E–17 | ||
Noise vs Twitter | Noise | 130 | 0.9 | 129 | 1 | 1.71E–21 | |
i | Twitter vs Tone | Tone | 129 | 0.79 | 128 | 1 | 1.56E–10 |
Phee vs Tone* | Tone | 9 | 0.89 | 9 | 1 | 7.81E–01 | |
Juvenile vs Twitter* | Juvenile | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
Phee vs Tone* | Phee | 10 | 0.7 | 10 | 1 | 1 | |
Twitter vs Tone | 120 | 0.8 | 119 | 1 | 1.71E–10 | ||
Juvenile vs Twitter* | 4 | 0.5 | 4 | 1 | 1 | ||
Noise vs Twitter | 142 | 0.76 | 141 | 1 | 3.37E–09 | ||
Noise vs Twitter | Noise | 144 | 0.88 | 143 | 1 | 2.50E–21 | |
k | Twitter vs Tone | Tone | 590 | 0.79 | 588 | 1 | 7.60E–46 |
Phee vs Tone | Tone | 597 | 0.88 | 596 | 1 | 5.35E–87 | |
Juvenile vs Twitter | Juvenile | 751 | 0.71 | 749 | 1 | 2.69E–29 | |
Phee vs Tone | Phee | 632 | 0.82 | 629 | 1 | 4.03E–63 | |
Twitter vs Tone | 601 | 0.79 | 598 | 1 | 5.14E–49 | ||
Juvenile vs Twitter | 787 | 0.7 | 785 | 1 | 1.25E–28 | ||
Noise vs Twitter | 541 | 0.64 | 532 | 1 | 7.54E–11 | ||
Noise vs Twitter | Noise | 624 | 0.47 | 615 | 1 | 1 |
Columns under “ Binomial test on performance (Fig. 4c)” report information regarding the statistical deviations of performance (across stimuli and task type) from a theoretically expected distribution of observations (one-sided), with p-values adjusted with a post-hoc Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Significant values are indicated in bold font. Stars behind the comparison in the column "Task" indicate low trial numbers performed suggesting a low statistical power.