Table 4. Qualitative Measurements of Image Quality.
Reader 1 | Reader 2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | P | Score | P | |
Overall image quality | 3.26 ± 0.48 | < 0.001 | 3.46 ± 0.52 | < 0.001 |
Image noise | 3.54 ± 0.58 | < 0.001 | 3.63 ± 0.57 | < 0.001 |
Image sharpness | 2.99 ± 0.29 | > 0.999 | 3.04 ± 0.19 | 0.134 |
Image texture | 2.82 ± 0.39 | < 0.001 | 2.76 ± 0.43 | < 0.001 |
Lesion conspicuity | 3.09 ± 0.36 | 0.219 | 3.29 ± 0.51 | 0.001 |
Data are mean ± standard deviation. A score of 3 was assigned if the LDCT with DLIR-M images were equivalent to SDCT with h-IR images. Higher scores reflected better overall image quality, less image noise, better image sharpness, more preferred image texture, and better lesion conspicuity. A one-sample Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to reject the null hypothesis: the median of qualitative scores for LDCT with DLIR-M images equals a hypothetical value of 3. DLIR-M = deep learning image reconstruction medium-strength, h-IR = hybrid iterative reconstruction, LDCT = lower-dose CT, SDCT = standard-dose CT