Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 27;23(4):402–412. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2021.0683

Table 4. Qualitative Measurements of Image Quality.

Reader 1 Reader 2
Score P Score P
Overall image quality 3.26 ± 0.48 < 0.001 3.46 ± 0.52 < 0.001
Image noise 3.54 ± 0.58 < 0.001 3.63 ± 0.57 < 0.001
Image sharpness 2.99 ± 0.29 > 0.999 3.04 ± 0.19 0.134
Image texture 2.82 ± 0.39 < 0.001 2.76 ± 0.43 < 0.001
Lesion conspicuity 3.09 ± 0.36 0.219 3.29 ± 0.51 0.001

Data are mean ± standard deviation. A score of 3 was assigned if the LDCT with DLIR-M images were equivalent to SDCT with h-IR images. Higher scores reflected better overall image quality, less image noise, better image sharpness, more preferred image texture, and better lesion conspicuity. A one-sample Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to reject the null hypothesis: the median of qualitative scores for LDCT with DLIR-M images equals a hypothetical value of 3. DLIR-M = deep learning image reconstruction medium-strength, h-IR = hybrid iterative reconstruction, LDCT = lower-dose CT, SDCT = standard-dose CT