TABLE 3.
Effects of the sampling date, breed and the sex on the complete blood count.
| Blood component (Giga/L) | Effect | Breed LSMeans (SE) | Sex LSMeans (SE) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sampling date | Breed | Sex | Romane | Blackbelly | Charollais | Male | Female | |
| White blood cells | *** | *** | ns | 8.13a (0.28) | 9.81b (0.29) | 8.00a (0.40) | ns | ns |
| Lymphocytes | *** | * | ns | 4.90a (0.23) | 5.72b (0.23) | 5.19ab (0.32) | ns | ns |
| Neutrophils | *** | *** | * | 2.60a (0.15) | 3.26b (0.15) | 2.27a (0.22) | 2.93a (0.15) | 2.49b (0.13) |
| Monocytes | *** | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
| Eosinophils | ** | *** | ns | 0.13a (0.01) | 0.25b (0.01) | 0.13a (0.02) | ns | ns |
| Basophils | *** | *** | ns | 0.06a (0.004) | 0.08b (0.004) | 0.06a (0.006) | ns | ns |
Statistical model 1 was used. ∗: p < 0.05, ∗∗: p < 0.01, ∗∗∗: p < 0.001. ns: not significant. Least square means (LSMeans) and the SE, of the breed and sex effects were estimated. For each effect, LSMeans, with different superscripts (a,b) were found to differ significantly (p < 0.05).