Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychobiol. 2021 Aug 22;63(6):e22171. doi: 10.1002/dev.22171

TABLE 2.

Child average RSA Models

Child average RSA models Parameter Child RSA predicting maternal RSA
Child RSA predicting paternal RSA
Estimate (SE) 95% CI p Value Estimate (SE) 95% CI p Value
Fixed effects
Timeγ20 −0.005 (0.003) [−0.011,0.002] .175 0.013 (0.004) [0.005,0.020] <01**
Resting RSAγ01 0.790 (0.042) [0.708,0.871] <.001*** 0.737 (0.053) [0.634, 0.840] <.001***
Dyadic positive affectγ02 0.001 (0.001) [0.708,0.871] .470 −0.001 (0.001) [−0.003,0.003] .766
Child average RSAγ03 −0.019 (0.046) [−0.109,0.071] .685 0.036 (0.068) [−0.094,0.167] .600
Child state RSAγ041 0.013 (0.028) [−0.042,0.067] .651 −0.061 (0.034) [−0.128,0.005] .070
Child state RSA2γ04.2 0.036 (0.026) [−0.009, 0.080] .116 0.002 (0.033) [−0.062, 0.066] .957
Child average RSA × state RSAγ0411 −0.002 (0.023) [−0.047,0.043] .937 0.036 (0.034) [−0.031,0.104] .290
Child average RSA × state RSA2γ04.21 0.052 (0.017) [0.019,0.086] <.01** −0.054 (0.032) [−0.118,0.009] .093
Random effects
Interceptμ0j 0.176 (0.419) [0.341,0.490] <.001*** 0.234 (0.483) [0.380, 0.576] <.001***

Estimate = unstandardized coefficients, CI = confidence interval.

Note. A total of 1522 observations nested within 83 dyads for mothers, 1160 observations nested within 61 dyads for fathers.

***

p < .001

**

p < .01

p < .10. Parameter nomenclature is in accordance with Equations 1 and 2.1.