Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 29;2022(3):CD012867. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012867.pub3

Comparison 3. Prostatic arterial embolization (PAE) versus sham (short term).

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
3.1 Urologic symptom scores 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.1.1 RCTs 1 80 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐12.07 [‐15.45, ‐8.69]
3.2 Quality of life 1   Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.2.1 RCTs 1 80 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐1.97 [‐2.48, ‐1.46]
3.3 Major adverse events 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.3.1 RCTs 1 80 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Not estimable
3.4 Retreatment 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.4.1 RCTs 1 80 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Not estimable
3.5 Ejaculatory disorder 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.5.1 RCTs 1 80 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Not estimable
3.6 Minor adverse events 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.6.1 RCTs 1 80 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.08 [0.58, 1.99]
3.7 Acute urinary retention 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.7.1 RCTs 1 80 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Not estimable