Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 30;62(3):352–363. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnab046

Table 2.

Relationships Between LAE and Cognitive Domains Using Conditional Parallel Process Latent Growth Curve Models Adjusted for Covariates

Global cognitive performance Memory Language Visuospatial function
n = 4,463 n = 4,412 n = 4,105 n = 4,363
Types of relationships Estimate 95% CI Estimate 95% CI Estimate 95% CI Estimate 95% CI
Autoregressive associations
Initial cognition → Rate of cognitive change 0.025 0.017 to 0.033 0.028 0.018 to 0.038 0.010 0.004 to 0.016 0.013 0.005 to 0.021
Initial LAE → Rate of change in LAE 0.015 0.023 to0.007 0.016 0.024 to0.008 0.015 0.023 to0.007 0.016 0.024 to0.008
Cross-lagged associations
Initial cognition → Rate of change in LAE 0.013 −0.001 to 0.027 0.010 0.000 to 0.020 0.000 −0.014 to 0.014 0.013 −0.003 to 0.029
Initial LAE → Rate of change in cognition 0.001 −0.003 to 0.005 0.003 −0.005 to 0.011 −0.002 −0.006 to 0.002 −0.003 −0.007 to 0.001
Correlations
Initial cognition → Initial LAE 0.055 0.045 to 0.065 0.058 0.042 to 0.074 0.064 0.052 to 0.076 0.047 0.035 to 0.059
Rate of cognitive change → Rate of change in LAE 0.001 0.001 to 0.001 0.001 0.001 to 0.001 0.001 0.001 to 0.001 0.000 0.000 to 0.000

Notes: LAE = leisure activity engagement; CI = confidence interval. Adjusted by baseline age, education in years, sex (female vs. male), enrollment year, race/ethnicity, occupation, baseline chronic disease sum score, and baseline income. Bolded results signify that the 95% CIs do not overlap with 0. Overall LAE scores have been standardized to baseline mean and standard deviation.