Table IV.

Comparison of clinical and questionnaire pre-tests in intensive circuit class therapy (ICT) and control groups

	Median (25th–75th percentile)	p-value*
EDSS
ICT	2.50 (2.00–2.50)	0.18
Control	2.00 (1.50–2.50)
FSBT (s)
ICT	40.00 (37.00–40.00)	0.48
Control	40.00 (39.28–40.00)
TUG test (ms)
ICT	848.00 (793.50–995.00)	0.90
Control	911.00 (803.50–995.00)
MFIS
ICT	28.00 (16.50–38.50)	0.79
Control	28.00 (9.50–41.00)
BDI
ICT	7.00 (2.50–11.00)	0.86
Control	7.00 (2.00–9.50)
MSWS-12
ICT	15.00 (13.50–20.00)	0.87
Control	18.00 (12.00–20.00)
SF-36-RLEP (%)
ICT	100.00 (67.00–100.00)	0.87
Control	100.00 (67.00–100.00)
SF-36-E (%)
ICT	50.00 (40.00–65.00)	0.89
Control	45.00 (35.00–70.00)
SF-36-EWB (%)
ICT	80.00 (64.00–88.00)	0.56
Control	72.00 (64.00–88.00)

ICT: intensive circuit class therapy; EDSS: Expanded Disability Status Scale; FSBT: Four-Stage Balance Test; TUG test: Timed Up and Go test; MFIS: Modified Fatigue Impact Scale; BDI: Beck Depression Inventory; MSWS-12: Twelve-Item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale; SF-36-E: Energy/fatigue; SF-36-RLEP: Role limitations due to emotional problems; SF-36-EWB: Emotional well-being

^*Student’s t-test for independent samples to compare parameters between particular groups.