Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Mar 29.
Published in final edited form as: Proc IEEE Int Conf Comput Vis. 2021 Oct;2021:3376–3385. doi: 10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00338

Table 2:

Comparison of ICON against the methods in [36], on cross-subject registration for OAI knee images.

Method Lsim Dice Folds Time [s]
Demons MSE 63.47 19.0 114
SyN CC 65.71 0 1330
NiftyReg NMI 59.65 0 143
NiftyReg LNCC 67.92 203 270
vSVF-opt LNCC 67.35 0 79
Voxelmorph (w/o affine) MSE 46.06 83 0.12
Voxelmorph MSE 66.08 39.0 0.31
AVSM (7-Step Affine, 3-Step Deformable) LNCC 68.40 14.3 0.83
ICON (2 step ½ res., 2 step full res., w/o affine) MSE 68.29 118.4 1.06
ICON (2 step ½ res., 1 step full res., w/o affine) MSE 66.16 169.4 0.57
ICON (2 step ½ res., w/o affine) MSE 59.36 49.35 0.09