TABLE 7.
Results of the hierarchical linear regression analyses on the relation between self-perceived EFs and mathematical performance in study 2 (N = 139).
| B | t | R 2 | ΔR2 | ΔF | |
| Model 1 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 3.76** | ||
| Constant | 111.42 | 3.92*** | |||
| Sex | 0.57 | 2.42 | |||
| LPE_Moderate | 0.50 | 4.01 | |||
| LPE_High | 8.99 | 4.23* | |||
| Model 2 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 3.22* | ||
| Constant | 100.37 | 9.72*** | |||
| Sex | 0.35 | 2.43 | |||
| LPE_Moderate | 0.66 | 4.01 | |||
| LPE_High | 8.23 | 4.26* | |||
| Self-perceived EFs | 0.39 | 0.31 |
Higher skill scores on the CITO Mathematics test indicate better performance; *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001.