TABLE 8.
Results of the hierarchical linear regression analyses on the relation between self-perceived EFs and reading comprehension performance in study 2 (N = 173).
| B | t | R 2 | ΔR2 | ΔF | |
| Model 1 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 11.05*** | ||
| Constant | 46.71 | 4.18*** | |||
| Sex | 3.70 | 2.58 | |||
| LPE_Moderate | 10.59 | 4.27** | |||
| LPE_High | 22.90 | 4.50*** | |||
| Model 2 | 0.17 | 0.15 | 8.74 | ||
| Constant | 34.47 | 10.36*** | |||
| Sex | 3.46 | 2.58 | |||
| LPE_Moderate | 10.76 | 4.27** | |||
| LPE_High | 22.06 | 4.54*** | |||
| Self-perceived EFs | 0.43 | 0.33 |
Higher skill scores on the CITO Reading test indicate better performance; **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001.