Table 3.
Quality assessment of included studies
| Reference | Cochrane collaboration tool domain | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Random sequence generation | Deviation from intended intervention | Missing outcome data | Outcome measurement | Selective reporting | Overall ROB | |
| HIMT versus passive or habitual activity control | ||||||
| Paoli et al. [44] | − | − | + | − | − | × |
| Meier et al. [47] | − | − | + | − | − | × |
| Schmidt et al. [58] | − | × | × | − | − | × |
| Batrakoulis et al. [18] | + | × | × | − | − | × |
| Romero-Arenas et al. [46] | − | − | + | + | − | × |
| Ajjimaporn et al. [43] | − | − | + | − | − | × |
| Engel et al. [41] | − | − | + | × | − | × |
| Batrakoulis et al. [40] | + | × | × | × | − | × |
| Eather et al. [25]a | − | + | × | × | − | × |
| Islam et al. [66] | − | × | × | − | − | × |
| McWeeny et al. [36] | − | − | + | − | − | × |
| Batrakoulis et al. [39] | + | × | × | − | − | × |
| HIMT versus structured activity (concurrent training) | ||||||
| Davis et al. [32] | × | × | × | + | − | × |
| Davis et al. [33] | × | × | × | + | − | × |
| Mirzaei et al. [45] | − | − | + | − | − | × |
| Heinrich et al. [24] | − | × | × | × | − | × |
| Carneiro et al. [35] | − | × | × | − | − | × |
| Nunes et al. [42] | − | − | + | − | − | × |
| Bahremand et al. [34] | − | × | × | − | − | × |
| Hovsepian et al. [67] | − | × | × | − | − | × |
HIMT, High-Intensity Multimodal Training; ROB risk of bias, + low risk of bias, × high risk of bias, − some risk of bias
aIntention-to-treat analysis