Table 3.
Positive aspects of the cross-border collaboration in the Euregio Meuse-Rhine (EMR).
| Area | Positive aspect | Participants (ID) |
|---|---|---|
| Communication | Structured and regular communication is very helpful, especially with EMRIC and the Euregio Meuse-Rhine as an organization | 4 |
| Communication | Communication generally functions well across the borders as it is based on a strong network | 9 |
| Preparedness | Exercises and preparation within EMRIC are useful for certain scenarios in cross-border collaboration | 8 |
| General collaboration | Good collaboration with EMRIC | 16 |
| General collaboration | Good collaboration between Eupen (German speaking community in BE) and Aachen (DE) for EMS | 16 |
| General collaboration | Considerably less collaboration between the hospitals in Maastricht and Eupen, but still works well | 16 |
| General collaboration | Positive cross-border collaboration between hospitals: on operational level in the ICU etc. very good and easy collaboration but on organizational level very complicated and difficult | 2 |
| Processes | Processes between South Limburg (NL) and Germany are improving more and more; advanced notification of German EMS to Dutch hospitals works well | 10 |
| Best practice exchange | Monitoring and exchange about national COVID-19 measures was helpful to learn from each other and allowed for aligning/adapting hygienic measures, such as wearing masks (especially in the beginning of the pandemic) | 18 |