Table 4.
Criteria | Yes/no/other (CD, NR, NA)* |
---|---|
1. Was the study question or objective clearly stated? | |
2. Was the study population clearly and fully described, including a case definition? | |
3. Were the cases consecutive? | |
4. Were the subjects comparable? | |
5. Was the intervention clearly described? | |
6. Were the outcome measures clearly defined, valid, reliable, and implemented consistently across all study participants? | |
7. Was the length of follow-up adequate? | |
8. Were the statistical methods well-described? | |
9. Were the results well-described? | |
Quality Rating (good, fair, or poor) | |
Rater #1 initials: | |
Rater #2 initials: | |
Additional Comments (If POOR, please state why): |
Abbreviations: *CD, cannot determine; NA, not applicable; NR, not reported.