TABLE 4.
Classification performance obtained using different methods.
Method | Validation set (%) |
Testing set (%) |
||||||
ACC | SEN | SPE | AUC | ACC | SEN | SPE | AUC | |
GAN | 73.08 | 71.43 | 75.00 | 79.17 | 73.79 | 75.00 | 70.37 | 82.46 |
FF-GAN | 73.08 | 71.43 | 75.00 | 79.17 | 77.67 | 76.32 | 81.48 | 85.04 |
GAN+fine-tune | 76.92 | 78.57 | 75.00 | 83.93 | 77.67 | 76.32 | 81.48 | 84.60 |
Ours (FF-GAN+fine-tune) | 76.92 | 78.57 | 75.00 | 87.50 | 79.61 | 78.95 | 81.48 | 85.19 |
p2pGAN | 73.08 | 71.43 | 75.00 | 79.17 | 73.79 | 72.37 | 77.78 | 83.09 |
FF-p2pGAN | 73.08 | 71.43 | 75.00 | 79.17 | 77.67 | 76.32 | 81.48 | 82.70 |
p2pGAN+fine-tune | 76.92 | 78.57 | 75.00 | 86.31 | 77.67 | 78.95 | 74.07 | 86.79 |
Ours (FF-p2pGAN+fine-tune) | 76.92 | 78.57 | 75.00 | 86.90 | 78.64 | 72.37 | 96.30 | 84.89 |
The bold values mean the best results.