TABLE 6.
Result comparison of other EMCI vs. LMCI classification methods.
Algorithm | Subjects | ACC (%) | SEN (%) | SPE (%) | AUC (%) |
Jie et al. (2018) | 56EMCI+43LMCI | 78.80 | 74.40 | 82.10 | 78.30 |
Nozadi and Kadoury (2018) | 164EMCI+189LMCI | 72.50 | 79.20 | 69.90 | 79.00 |
Wee et al. (2019) | 899EMCI+638LMCI | 60.90 | 52.50 | 67.80 | N/A |
Lei et al. (2020) | 44EMCI+38LMCI | 81.71 | 78.95 | 84.09 | 92.11 |
Yang et al. (2021) | 29EMCI+18LMCI | 80.85 | N/A | N/A | 84.87 |
Ours | 151EMCI+209LMCI | 83.78 | 80.95 | 87.50 | 88.99 |
The bold values mean the best results.