Table 1.

Acceptance of the District Health Information System version 2 based on the technology acceptance model.

Constructsa			Mean (SD)		Median		Mode
Perceived ease of use
	Overall, I am satisfied with how easy it is to use DHIS2b	5.2 (1.9)		6		7
	It was simple to use DHIS2	5.4 (2.0)		6		7
	It is easy to find the information I needed	5.2 (1.7)		5		7
	It was easy to learn to use DHIS2	5.3 (2.2)		7		7
	I feel comfortable using DHIS2	5.7 (2.1)		7		7
	The information (such as online help, on-screen messages, and other documentation) provided with DHIS2 is clear	5.1 (1.7)		5		7
	The interface of DHIS2 is pleasant	5.7 (1.5)		6		7
	DHIS2 gives error messages that clearly tell me how to fix problems	3.8 (2.2)		3		3
	Whenever I make a mistake using DHIS2, I recover easily and quickly	4.6 (1.9)		4		3
	The organization of information on the system screens is clear	5.8 (1.3)		6		6
	The information provided for the system is easy to understand	5.3 (1.9)		6		7
Perceived usefulness
	I am able to complete my work quickly using DHIS2	5.1 (2.2)		6		7
	I can effectively complete my work using DHIS2	5.5 (1.9)		7		7
	I believe I became productive quickly using DHIS2	5.4 (1.9)		6		7
	The information is effective in helping me complete the tasks and scenarios	5.4 (1.8)		6		7
	DHIS2 has all the functions and capabilities I expect it to have	5.4 (1.5)		6		6
	Overall, DHIS2 improved data management activities for the malaria program	5.6 (2.1)		7		7
	Overall, DHIS2 improved data analysis of malaria cases	5.6 (1.6)		6		7
	DHIS2 contributed to timely decision-making processes	5.9 (1.6)		6		7
	Overall, DHIS2 improved timely reporting of malaria cases	5.8 (1.8)		6		7
Acceptance of technology
	I like using the interface of DHIS2	5.1 (1.9)		6		6
	Overall, I am satisfied with the DHIS2 system	5.1 (1.9)		6		6

^aResponses were in the form of a Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree).

^bDHIS2: District Health Information System version 2.