Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 15;10(3):e30587. doi: 10.2196/30587

Table 2.

Empirical coverage of the human activity recognition (HAR) using smartphones and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology-Beth Israel Hospital (MIT-BIH) arrhythmia data sets by different normalization methods. Target coverage was set before training.

Target coverage HAR using smartphones data set MIT-BIH arrhythmia data set

Normalization method of selective prediction Normalization method of selective prediction

UBSa BNb Without normalizationc UBS BN Without normalization
0.95, mean (SD) 0.9660 (0.0029) 0.9996 (0.0001) 0.9986 (0.0002) 0.9564 (0.0019) 0.9680 (0.0067) 1.0000 (0)
0.90, mean (SD) 0.9053 (0.0035) 0.9980 (0.0001) 0.9984 (0.0001) 0.9084 (0.0055) 0.9998 (0.0001) 1.0000 (0)
0.85, mean (SD) 0.8582 (0.0007) 0.9237 (0.0026) 0.9986 (0.0002) 0.8888 (0.0016) 0.9518 (0.0001) 1.0000 (0)
Average violation, % 0.98 7.38 9.85 1.79 7.32 10.00

aUBS: unit-wise batch standardization.

bBN: batch normalization (a normalization method using the mean and variance obtained from the input batch).

cWithout normalization means that there was no normalization in the selection function structure.