Table 2.
Empirical coverage of the human activity recognition (HAR) using smartphones and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology-Beth Israel Hospital (MIT-BIH) arrhythmia data sets by different normalization methods. Target coverage was set before training.
| Target coverage | HAR using smartphones data set | MIT-BIH arrhythmia data set | |||||
|
|
Normalization method of selective prediction | Normalization method of selective prediction | |||||
|
|
UBSa | BNb | Without normalizationc | UBS | BN | Without normalization | |
| 0.95, mean (SD) | 0.9660 (0.0029) | 0.9996 (0.0001) | 0.9986 (0.0002) | 0.9564 (0.0019) | 0.9680 (0.0067) | 1.0000 (0) | |
| 0.90, mean (SD) | 0.9053 (0.0035) | 0.9980 (0.0001) | 0.9984 (0.0001) | 0.9084 (0.0055) | 0.9998 (0.0001) | 1.0000 (0) | |
| 0.85, mean (SD) | 0.8582 (0.0007) | 0.9237 (0.0026) | 0.9986 (0.0002) | 0.8888 (0.0016) | 0.9518 (0.0001) | 1.0000 (0) | |
| Average violation, % | 0.98 | 7.38 | 9.85 | 1.79 | 7.32 | 10.00 | |
aUBS: unit-wise batch standardization.
bBN: batch normalization (a normalization method using the mean and variance obtained from the input batch).
cWithout normalization means that there was no normalization in the selection function structure.