Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 2;3(3):189–195. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.33.BJO-2021-0199.R1

Table II.

Covariate balance across comparison groups before and after propensity score weighting.

Before propensity score weighting After propensity score weighting
Variable NPWT group (n = 266) Standard wound dressing group(n = 1,056) SMD NPWT group (n = 266) Standard wound dressing
group (n = 1,056, weighted as 318)
SMD
Gustilo grade, %
II 27.4 59.5 -0.72 27.4 27.5 -0.0002
IIIA 37.2 33.1 0.09 37.2 37.2 0
IIIB 35.3 7.5 0.58 35.3 35.3 0.0002
Mechanism of injury, %
High energy 97.7 90.7 0.47 97.7 97.7 0.0008
Fracture location, %
Tibia 63.9 50.5 0.28 63.9 63.9 0.0001
Contamination, %
Mild 46.6 74.3 -0.56 46.6 46.6 -0.0001
Moderate 38.4 20.9 0.36 38.4 38.4 0
Severe 15 4.7 0.29 15 15 0.0002
Irrigation solution, %
Saline 51.1 53.7 -0.05 51.1 51.1 0.0001
Skin loss 49.6 17.5 0.64 49.6 49.6 0.0002
Muscle loss 39.9 13.6 0.54 39.9 39.8 0.0002
Propensity score, probability 0.35 0.16 0.83 0.35 0.35 -0.0005

NPWT, negative pressure wound therapy; SMD, standardized mean difference.