Table 7.
Results of a logistic regression model to investigate the relationship between Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and dietary pattern quintiles
| Dietary pattern | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Pc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (CI 95%) | OR (CI 95%) | OR (CI 95%) | OR (CI 95%) | OR (CI 95%) | ||
| Western | ||||||
| Crude | 1 | 3.66 (1.50–8.92) | 2.65 (1.09–6.24) | 3.33 (1.37–8.08) | 3.52 (1.64–8.61) | 0.01 |
| Model 1a | 1 | 3.31 (1.30–8.42) | 2.29 (0.86–6.08) | 2.72 (0.95–7.78) | 2.64 (0.79–8.83) | 0.28 |
| Model 2b | 1 | 4.43 (1.60–12.26) | 3.12 (1.07–9.09) | 3.30 (1.06–10.27) | 3.76 (0.97–14.48) | 0.19 |
| Traditional | ||||||
| Crude | 1 | 0.79 (0.33–1.87) | 1.75 (0.74–4.12) | 1.82 (0.77–4.27) | 2.35 (0.98–5.62) | 0.01 |
| Model 1a | 1 | 0.79 (0.33–1.86) | 1.59 (0.65–3.89) | 1.54 (0.58–4.04) | 1.90 (0.68–5.39) | 0.14 |
| Model 2b | 1 | 0.69 (0.76–1.73) | 1.54 (0.59–4.04) | 1.10 (0.59–3.19) | 1.43 (0.46–4.42) | 0.45 |
| Snack and sugar | ||||||
| Crude | 1 | 1.04 (0.44–2.43) | 0.82 (0.35–1.93) | 0.72 (0.31–1.68) | 0.91 (0.38–2.21) | 0.56 |
| Model 1a | 1 | 0.99 (0.41–2.35) | 0.78 (0/32–1.85) | 0.57 (0.23–1.37) | 0.57 (0.22–1.46) | 0.12 |
| Model 2b | 1 | 1.22 (0.47–3.14) | 0.93 (0.35–2.48) | 0.80 (0.30–2.14) | 0.77 (0.28–2.12) | 0.21 |
aAdjusted for energy intake (Kcal/day)
bAdjusted for energy intake (Kcal/day), Education (high school, diploma, associate degree, bachelor's and higher), Job (housewife, employee, and free job), Diabetes disease history (yes/no), consumption of medication and supplements (yes/no), Physical activity (< 1 h, > 1 h). OR, Odds Ratio; CI, Confidence Interval
cP value trend