Table 5.

Predictive models of prodromal eating pathology.

	Imputed cases (n = 11,303)
	b	SE	95% CI	OR
Model 1
Risk taking, age 11	−0.36*	0.16	−0.69 to −0.03	0.69
Quality of decision-making, age 11	−0.19	0.15	−0.49 to 0.11	0.82
Deliberation time, age 11	0.00	0.00	−0.00 to 0.00	1.00
Risk adjustment, age 11	−0.07	0.03	−0.14 to 0.00	0.93
Delay-aversion, age 11	0.18	0.13	0.08 to 0.45	1.20
Model 2
Risk taking, age 11	0.47**	0.18	0.10 to 0.84	1.60
Quality of decision-making, age 11	−0.34*	0.16	−0.66 to −0.02	0.70
Deliberation time, age 11	0.00	0.00	−0.00 to 0.00	1.00
Risk adjustment, age 11	0.01	0.03	−0.05 to 0.08	1.01
Delay-aversion, age 11	0.21	0.14	−0.07 to 0.50	1.24

Model 1 = Cambridge Gambling Task measures. Model 2 = Model 1+ gender, ethnicity, family poverty status, IQ at age 5, puberty signs at age 11, exact age, accelerometer-measured physical activity at age 14, internalizing and externalizing symptoms at age 11. The table displays results of our logistic regression analyses.

^* p  < 0.05;

^**p < 0.01.