. 2022 Mar 14;2022:1353724. doi: 10.1155/2022/1353724

Table 2.

Relative abundance (%) of mouse cecal microbiota at phylum level.

Index	A	B	C	D	E
Firmicutes	70.96 ± 2.83^a	45.26 ± 7.36^bc	49.61 ± 8.81^b	30.14 ± 13.82^c	36.94 ± 15.17^bc
Bacteroidetes	24.56 ± 3.78^a	48.50 ± 3.92^b	45.02 ± 11.00^b	61.10 ± 11.04^c	28.38 ± 3.89^ad
Epsilonbacteraeota	0.12 ± 0.12^a	2.32 ± 3.17^ab	1.71 ± 1.36^ab	5.61 ± 3.85^b	3.59 ± 4.78^ab
Proteobacteria	3.22 ± 1.44^a	2.11 ± 1.31^a	2.39 ± 1.42^a	1.7787 ± 0.59^a	15.17 ± 11.40^b
Verrucomicrobia	0.03 ± 0.03^a	0.03 ± 0.02^a	0.31 ± 0.28^a	0.10 ± 0.06^a	14.83 ± 6.20^b
Actinobacteria	0.26 ± 0.08^ab	0.16 ± 0.08^a	0.25 ± 0.17^ab	0.34 ± 0.12^b	0.29 ± 0.16^ab
Tenericutes	0.39 ± 0.09	0.44 ± 0.48	0.37 ± 0.33	0.09 ± 0.12	0.43 ± 0.69

A: NC group; B: 3% DSS treatment group; C: 3%DSS+p-HLP(L) group; D: 3%DSS+p-HLP(H) group; E: control+p-HLP group. There is significant difference (P < 0.05) if the data are labeled with different letters (a–d) in the same line.