Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 16;12:845549. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.845549

Table 4.

Diagnostic performance of each USE methods.

Method Studies,n Benign,n Malignant,n Sens, %(CI, %)(I-square, %) Spec, %(CI, %)(I-square, %) PLR (CI) NLR (CI) AUC (CI, %)
Qualitative USE 26 4,635 2,640 84
(83–85)
(91.1)
81
(80–82)
(95.5)
4.7
(3.5–6.3)
0.24
(0.17–0.34)
89.0
(86.8–91.2)
Semi-quantitative USE 22 3,801 1,889 83
(81–84)
(83.3)
80
(79–82)
(96.7)
6.5
(4.2–10.1)
0.19
(0.13–0.27)
92.9
(91.0–94.7)
Quantitative USE 32 4,236 2,507 78
(76–79)
(58.6)
81
(80–82)
(89.5)
4.4
(3.6–5.5)
0.28
(0.24–0.33)
87.0
(85.7–88.2)

USE, Ultrasound Elastography.