Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2022 Feb 4;46(3):447–457. doi: 10.1111/acer.14779

Table 1.

Differences in Prepartying Behavior and Motives by History of Past-Year Incapacitated Rape

Variable Study 1
Study 2
Overall N = 1,074 Past-Year IR p Overall N = 1,751 Past-Year IR at Baseline p
No n = 979 Yes n = 95 No n = 1,636 Yes n = 115
Concurrent Assessment
  Preparty drinks in past month 21.44 (25.70) 19.90 (22.95) 37.38 (42.15) <.001 15.70 (20.70) 15.04 (19.21) 25.17 (34.46) .002
  Preparty blackouts in past month 0.65 (1.40) 0.55 (1.13) 1.65 (2.78) <.001 0.40 (1.04) 0.37 (0.97) 0.86 (1.65) .002
  Situational control motives 2.26 (0.96) 2.24 (0.96) 2.50 (0.96) .013 -- -- -- --
  Interpersonal enhancement motives 2.91 (1.03) 2.88 (1.03) 3.22 (1.02) .002 -- -- -- --
  Intimate pursuit motives 1.65 (0.87) 1.59 (0.81) 2.30 (1.15) <.001 -- -- -- --
  Barriers to consumption motives 2.53 (1.14) 2.48 (1.12) 3.06 (1.15) <.001 -- -- -- --
12-Month Follow-up Assessment
  Past-year IR -- -- -- -- 4.8% (72) 4.2% (59) 13.4% (13) <.001
  Preparty drinks in past month -- -- -- -- 11.25 (17.77) 11.21 (17.99) 11.81 (14.18) .692
  Preparty blackouts in past month -- -- -- -- 0.33 (0.95) 0.32 (0.93) 0.49 (1.14) .150

Note. IR = Incapacitated Rape. Percentage or mean (standard deviation) are shown. P values reflect the significance of chi-square test of independence for Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables (i.e., past-year IR at follow-up) and Welch’s t-test for continuous variables (i.e., all other variables). Bolded values are significantly different at p < .05. One participant in Study 1 was missing data on blackout frequency. A different participant in Study 1 was missing data on two of four items within the situational control motives scale; thus, a mean value was not computed for this participant. Two participants in Study 2 were missing past-year IR data at baseline and excluded from examination of bivariate associations.