Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Mar 30.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Ecol Evol. 2021 Apr 12;5(6):826–835. doi: 10.1038/s41559-021-01428-w

Table 2 ∣.

Parameter values

Parameter Meaning Value Model(s)
K Tumour carrying capacity 2 × 1012 Model 3
K s Carrying capacity of a fully susceptible tumour 2 × 1012 Model 4
K r Carrying capacity of a fully resistant tumour Varied Model 4
ρ, ρr, ρs Baseline per-cell growth rate (per day) 0.005928 Models 3 and 4
α Competition coefficient 1 Model 4
β Competition coefficient Varied Model 4
λ Treatment sensitivity 1 Models 3 and 4
C max Maximal instantaneous tolerated dose 2 Models 3 and 4
N 0 Initial tumour size 1010 Models 3 and 4
R 0 Initial resistant cell population size 2.3 × 105 Models 3 and 4
N tol Tumour size corresponding to treatment failure 7 × 1010 Models 3 and 4
N crit Lethal tumour size 5 × 1011 Models 3 and 4

Except when otherwise specified, numerical results use the following parameter values. Model 4 is introduced later on. The initial size of the resistant subpopulation is derived through the Goldie–Coldman formula2: R0=(1N02τ)N02, where τ=10−6 is the mutation and back mutation rate of Monro and Gaffney14 and N0 is the initial tumour size. The value of Ntol is arbitrary (in log scale, this is almost the average of N0 and Ncrit). The value of Cmax is for consistency with the clinical trial results reported by Zhang et al.4. On average, the cumulative dose given in that trial was 47% of the MTD, which is consistent with values of Cmax between 2 and 2.5 assuming the initial tumour is highly sensitive (higher values otherwise). Since λCmax = 2, it takes as much time for a fully sensitive tumour size to double in the absence of treatment as to be halved under MTD; the dose C = Cmax/2 would precisely stabilize a fully sensitive tumour.