Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 16;13:802992. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.802992

Table 4.

Incidence rate and SUCRA for the efficacy of treatments to induce end points in the T2DM patients.

End event All-cause death Cardiovascular events Volume depletion
Treatment Event
(n)
Total (n) Incidence rate (%) SUCRA
(%)
Event
(n)
Total (n) Incidence rate (%) SUCRA
(%)
Event
(n)
Total (n) Incidence rate (%) SUCRA
(%)
Placebo 1027 20916 4.91 83.0 1814 16162 11.22 80.0 284 15524 1.83 25.0
Dapagliflozin 2.5mg 4 456 0.87 89.7 12 456 2.63 46.9 1 456 0.22 55.0
Dapagliflozin 5mg 3 1020 0.29 33.7 13 615 2.11 23.9 11 1020 1.08 29.9
Dapagliflozin 10mg 539 10484 5.14 68.4 27 1822 1.48 45.7 245 11207 2.19 38.6
Empagliflozin 10mg 17 2534 0.67 26.3 24 902 2.66 30.9 29 1287 2.25 30.5
Empagliflozin 25mg 21 2692 0.78 23.9 35 1108 3.16 21.8 41 1488 2.76 50.5
Canagliflozin 100mg 347 8128 4.27 50.6 559 4645 12.03 63.1 41 2814 1.46 75.1
Canagliflozin 300mg 5 3648 0.14 24.4 14 236 5.93 87.7 62 2814 2.20 95.5

The graphs display the distribution of probabilities of treatment ranked from best to worst for each outcome. The ranking indicates the probability that the drug class is first “best,” second “best”, etc. For example, the ranking suggests that dapagliflozin 2.5mg posed the highest risk for incurring all-cause death (worst), while empagliflozin 25mg incurred the lowest probability of all-cause death (best).