Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 21;21(1):e12453. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12453

TABLE 4.

Ovarian stimulation methods in childhood, adolescent, and young adult patients with breast cancer and hematologic malignancy

(a) Breast cancer
Institutions, n COS, n (%) AI, n (%)
Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post
Embryos 87 110 82/87 (94.0) 109/110 (99.1) 51/81 (62.9) 86/103 (83.5)*
Oocytes 64 81 61/64 (95.3) 79/81 (97.5) 41/60 (68.3) 73/79 (92.4)*
(b) Hematologic malignancy
Institutions, n COS, n (%) Random‐start COS, n (%)
Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post
Embryos 53 69 52/53 (98.1) 69/69 (100) 23/49 (46.9) 54/68 (79.4)*
Oocytes 50 60 49/50 (98.0) 59/60 (98.3) 24/46 (52.1) 54/59 (91.5)*

Pre, 2011–2015, i.e., before publication of the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines 2017 for Fertility Preservation in Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancer Patients 8 , 9 ; post, 2016–2019, i.e., from shortly before to after publication of the guidelines. *p < 0.05 vs. ratio during 2011–2015 (pre).

Abbreviations: AI, aromatase inhibitor; COS, controlled ovarian stimulation.