Table 3.
Results of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) [9] performed for the four cohort studies.
Author(s) | Cohort Studies | Selection |
Comparability |
Outcomes | Total of nine scores | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | (∗∗) | 1 | 2 | 3 | |||
Hernandez-Romieu et al. [7] | Multi-center, Retrospective | N | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | 8 |
Mellado-Artigas et al. [8] | Multi-center, Prospective | ∗ | N | ∗ | ∗ | ∗∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | 8 |
Pandya et al. [5] | Single-center, Retrospective | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | 9 |
Vera et al. [6] | Single-center, Prospective | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | 9 |
1. Representatives of exposed cohorts.
2. Selection of non-exposed cohorts.
3. Ascertainment of exposure.
4. Outcome of interest not present at the start of the study.
Comparability: Study controls are compared for the most important factor and additional factors.
a) Assessment of outcome.
b) Enough follow-up for outcome.
c) Adequacy of follow-up.
Abbreviations: ∗, positive variable; N, negative variable.