Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 17;9:832920. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.832920

Table 4.

The auxiliary performance of FGGDL interface in the real world.

Diagnosis accuracy
No AI With AI P-value
Clinician 1 0.838 (0.801–0.874) 0.885 (0.854–0.916) 0.024
Clinician 2 0.833 (0.796–0.869) 0.875 (0.842–0.908) 0.024
Senior student 1 0.758 (0.715–0.800) 0.798 (0.758–0.837) 0.059
Senior student 2 0.753 (0.710–0.795) 0.863 (0.829–0.896) 0.000
Junior student 1 0.588 (0.539–0.636) 0.820 (0.782–0.858) 0.000
Junior student 2 0.630 (0.582–0.678) 0.758 (0.715–0.800) 0.000
Junior student 3 0.460 (0.411–0.509) 0.813 (0.774–0.851) 0.000
Junior student 4 0.695 (0.650–0.740) 0.875 (0.842–0.908) 0.000
Machine 0.893 (0.862–0.923)

Diagnosis accuracy and progression prediction accuracy are presented with 95% CIs.